Select Page

This is a simple case with plenty of bone, plenty of attached gingiva and quite good prosthetic space. So we might as well expect some esthetic results.

0029110A 00291117
However, it’s interesting to notice the difference in healing following the two different techniques chosen while stitching the flaps back in place.

00291101   00291102
0029110D   0029110C

On the right side I simply faced both parts of the wound and sewed them up with simple and double stitches. The picture sequence is as of 0, 5 and 22 day period.

00029110F  50029110H  220029110K
On the left side I removed part of the gum prior to sewing both ends in place, letting the screws exposed. The healing, as we can see, is apparently healthier, no second surgery was needed to expose the healing screws, but the final result was the same on both sides. Basically, because the attached gingiva was generous on both, the gum biotype was thick and there was no need to lift up the flaps during surgery, as the bone was wide enough, too.
00029110G   50029110I 220029110J

These are the radiographic details. External hexagon 3.75 x13 and 10mm, . Front implant overlapped radiographically due to the pantomographic angle of exposure.

00291100     0029110L
0029110M     0029110O
Prosthetic phase
All except for the stump on 24, are screwed. 24 was done on stump because the intermaxillary gap was short. The antagonist 35 was also reduced in height, as you may see. When the occlusion is so well defined, I take partial casts, as they are more comfortable to obtain.
0029110R 0029110T 0029110S
00291116 00291111  00291115
0029110W0029110Y 0029110X
0029110Z 00291110
  00291113 00291112 00291114
The three screw chimneys are filled up with glass ionomer cement for this final result
I placed an overnight acrylic splint to prevent bruxism, too.
 0029111B 0029111C 0029111D